Mystical machinations of Mullumby. AFL modelling with a view to line bet selection.
round 14 - bets
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Worth noting that both Collingwood and Hawthorn "would" be bets except that Mullumby Defender automatically rejects all bets with lines less than -44 (but gee I like them). No bet will be placed on them.
Well, given the 11 other models at Squiggle I decided to see how THEY went picking Line bets. I tabulated success over the 44 games in rounds 7 to 11, and also just for the 12 selected games by Defender. While defender made $1.60 (all $10 bets) if all games were bet on, and 5 models went backwards HPN is the standout, making $78 over the 5 rounds. Of course over the 12 Defender selected games: 1) Defender made $72 2) HPN actually loses $43 WTF When Defender is right HPN is wrong and vice versa. I decided to look at HPN on all games EXCEPT the games Defender self selected - WOW HPN makes $121 over 23 $10 line bets. While I can only fine tune and fully understand defender, I may be able to make use of HPN, plus if the trend continues over time the combination of the models may be greater than either.
Note Gold Coast selection is removed because of poor reliability at winning selected games Gold Coast win 30% of games selected by Defender to win St Kilda lose 89% of the games Defender selects them to lose Product = 27% which is less than the optimised parameter of 35% - so no bet
Comments
Post a Comment